From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 18 15:31:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37927D2; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-f174.google.com (mail-ve0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749122AD; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id pb11so4421169veb.5 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:30:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MXKJ7du/iTT48BBzaBdAcVp/0fwZNRHAXclG4LhEXj8=; b=dVT6WgxK/MRsO0FA5B8Da8nHH41cbugSbJNW4zz628X7ohZN3Wl9k8gmiezF/jyL0H G2oL14jdjL3QswVrowMSUxG+Hqa8EeJTBY4ot584qy4LfzCMlETj160LfzYtkp8EKzUg IhIGWGaKhFYZFZDlwA2hYIs1WeqrB93UyCwwYcD3NY8NDpO6fW80lTtfx3kMviQgWq2c zbs/oGJCeTh0ZpZ2Ag7cjKt5tbCg27Xg4raZuYPmNXdgBULwafGct/Iv1Uhsf7G1psf6 oolG/wMwqQo7SGcqqz/HzzWiAGvLPpzbjL2rjamUq1Cw4QVp+WYLq+nmpKYw6ok+LNRG hqNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.23.169 with SMTP id n9mr20409385vef.58.1363620657784; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.132.203 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:30:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <36506.1363620375@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <35878.1363607691@critter.freebsd.dk> <514715F9.2080506@freebsd.org> <36506.1363620375@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:30:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Poul-Henning Kamp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland , Nathan Whitehorn X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:31:05 -0000 On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , "Steven > Hartland" writes: > > >You state there that "The main boards are the same" which indicates to me > >the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other > subtle > >difference causing the problem. > > > >To confirm you'll need to use the "exact same machine" for tests with the > only > >difference being the ram modules installed. > > Or, at the very least, switch _all_ the RAM between the two machines, and > confirm > that the problem follows the RAM. > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > Yes . http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/031836.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/031912.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/031928.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/032012.html Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk