From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 3 17:35:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C9D16A406 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 17:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp102.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEFCB13C46A for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 17:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 95418 invoked from network); 3 May 2007 17:35:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nzhwCfAh+/32Il10WG9OM3153WyTs4Us5K9uD36T9Y0EEVDVYnmLMxzVuAlWhlFp79hVeunFjNJKNYaMjiPU1+wh23IpRk249bcC74IgmqlbC2a6IDE5UBcmBghVR4qa7CRE8C21FV20Yi2GijNKk9hRlrRh5TjvARWwICGpKwI= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.75.156 with plain) by smtp102.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 May 2007 17:35:18 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 1n5SDXcVM1lgOG9O9Zg0fTgjTo9Bmd5jU298UnOb4gtp.UsAFstdmEIzbYagxSbFeUH1tnpmUMT45OwYexE3lCrfNDArbSUKH2I0 From: Stevan Tiefert To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20070503170649.GA86386@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1178183489.833.9.camel@vagabund.w33> <1178193722.43472.6.camel@vagabund.w33> <20070503170649.GA86386@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:35:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1178213714.97441.11.camel@vagabund.w33> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Pantyukhin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is 6.2-RELEASE/packages/Latest/ not latest enough? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 17:35:20 -0000 Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 13:06 -0400 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:01:53PM +0200, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 15:28 +0400 schrieb Andrew Pantyukhin: > > > On 5/3/07, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > I have installed via pkg_add -r various packages for my 6.2-RELEASE. I > > > > have recognized that on this way I will not get always the newest > > > > package. > > > > > > You only get the packages compiled during the release > > > process. Newer packages are only built for 6-stable and > > > 7-current. The hard truth is that we don't have enough > > > human/hardware resources to keep 6.2 packages up-to-date. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > That is not that I mean! > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/packages/editors/openoffice.org-2.0.4.tbz > > exists. But the Link: > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/packages/Latest/openoffice.org.tbz > > is linked with > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/packages/All/openoffice.org-1.1.5_2.tbz > > > > It is a simple change with ln. Not more! openoffice.org 2.0 was already > > created during the RELEASE-6.2-process. > > > > Still again: Why is this link showing to an older package, when to the > > same time a newer package exist for the RELEASE_6_2 (not RELENG_6)? > > There are several openoffice versions in the ports tree, and the > maintainer determined that this is the one that should be used as the > "default" choice. Typically when there are more than one version, the > link points to the recommended stable release. > > That said, it's possible that the maintainer overlooked updating the > link when 2.0 became stable. Please check whether it is the same in > the packages-6.2-stable package sets (i.e. the current packages, not > the release packages which are now 6 months out of date) and if so > then follow up with the openoffice maintainer. > > Thanks, > Kris After that: setenv PACKAGESITE ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/ and: pkg_add -r openoffice.org It still installs the version 1.1.5... It seems they forgot until now to update this link... I have written to openoffice.org@freebsd.org the maintainer of this port. Now I will wait until they answer... ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de