From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sat Jun 13 05:53:26 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C032BA07
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:53:26 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49kRbS39kNz4bZF
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:53:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: CR LF was: freebsd vs. netbsd
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 23:53:21 -0600
References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de>
 <00225a04-237d-9051-9aea-12c192106a20@anatoli.ws>
 <373EDB20-C750-42E2-A41B-EA61F6E49807@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <20200609120136.00005b3c@seibercom.net>
 <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws>
 <e1f6623a-3b3c-a43e-446a-d41f20f69418@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net>
 <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com>
 <20200611070630.2cb42786.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <EA869B95-9D98-4ECC-9371-C57A0035BC32@kreme.com>
 <20200611075658.1dd841a9.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <20200611082443.0000187a@seibercom.net>
 <2e6c6baf-9d87-2a02-00c3-578c6630f97f@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <20200611172537.2f7cdc07@archlinux>
 <b1d78ca6-f5f8-02d0-25c6-b53d21771fd6@panix.com>
 <20200612081401.f5a5c95b.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <4fff9eab-fa74-afe9-b046-9b0bcdb072ce@panix.com>
 <CAEJNuHw32nUd8c=OJTB1SpDXUTxJfLERHoUKDyWby0nTqQcc-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <f3172f9f-24f5-f776-a466-960555956aea@missouri.edu>
To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <f3172f9f-24f5-f776-a466-960555956aea@missouri.edu>
Message-Id: <5FE406BC-7295-4A33-BF3C-B81AD4705E6C@kreme.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49kRbS39kNz4bZF
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.45)[-0.449]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.61)[-0.615]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.04)[0.039]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:53:26 -0000

On 12 Jun 2020, at 13:32, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen =
<stephen@missouri.edu> wrote:
> It always seemed to me to be a waste of bits.  Why not have one ASCII
> code that did both?  Then I found out why.
>=20
> One time, I decided to try a LF CR at the end of a line instead of CR
> LF.  I found that the next character that was typed ended up in the
> middle of the page, not on the far left as it should have been.  What =
I
> realized was that the CR takes time to complete, because it has to
> physically move the printer head to the left margin.  The extra LF =
gave
> the printer the extra time it needed.

Not sure about teletypes, butt here were other reasons to have separate =
codes for line feeds and carriage return: strikeout and underline.

This word is underlined<CR>
,,,,,,,,,,,,,__________=20

Where each , is a space. Same for strikethrough, m using a dash instead.



--=20
We understand the importance of having the bondage between the parent
	and the child.