From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jun 15 6:45:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ints.ru (ints.ru [194.67.173.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF7115217 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ilmar@ws-ilmar.ints.ru) Received: from ws-ilmar.ints.ru (ws-ilmar.ints.ru [194.67.173.16]) by ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA19550; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:45:32 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ws-ilmar.ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.1) id RAA92256; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:45:30 +0400 (MSD) Received: from localhost(127.0.0.1) via SMTP by localhost, id smtpds92254; Tue Jun 15 17:45:26 1999 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:45:26 +0400 (MSD) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" To: Gustavo V G C Rios Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nmap needs bfp ? In-Reply-To: <3765910F.86DB16B9@tdnet.com.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote: > > Does nmap need bfp ? > I was running it on my 3.2 system! > Suddenly it stop working, complaining it needs bfp, but did it happen? > I did not rebuild my kernel, the kernel is the same, i did no changes to > the kernel! Maybe there is another app, that uses bpf. trafshow, ntop are using bpf. If so simply increase amount of bpf devices in kernel config file. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message