From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 14 11: 3:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41FE1514D; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:03:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id LAA36450; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:03:29 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199910141803.LAA36450@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, root@totally.morphed.com Subject: Re: arplookup.... In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:33:47 -0600 (MDT) >From: "Jason L. Schwab" >I run a 3.3-STABLE box on a T3 network, and I own 64 ips out of a c class >those 64 ips are between XXX.XXX.XXX.134 tho XXX.XXX.XXX.198 and There i >dont own or use 207.66.106.1 .. but i'm always getting these messages. >Altho I do have firewall rules that use 207.66.106.0/24, could that be the >problem? Please help! >arplookup 207.66.106.1 failed: host is not on local network >... Yes. Tell the machine the truth about the network it's on -- specify an appropriate netmask for the actual circumstances. If you tell it /24, that means that 207.66.106.1 is on the local network. In your case, it would seem that /26 would be a better choice (though you might be able to use (e.g.) /27 or /28, if you subnet your /26). Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message