From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 18:30:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F4F16A41F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BBA43D66 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:29:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E80ED22EF7 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:29:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:29:42 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 6/GNXscxJ48l9mzrdwG8ZbslAoKF2KKkrOrAi4DxKFuA 1134584981 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-201-30.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.201.30]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C0E57146F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:29:41 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:29:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43A031B1.2030105@supsi.ch> <43A04A05.3060504@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <43A04A05.3060504@ywave.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512141829.36933.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: grub doesn't know ufs filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:30:07 -0000 On Wednesday 14 December 2005 16:36, Micah wrote: > Some of the grubs that ship with Linux distros > do not support ufs. I'm curious as to why people care about this so much. There are numerous threads about whether or not particular bootloaders support UFS. A bootloader needs to understand Linux filesystems to boot Linux off a logical partition, but BSDs slices are always on primary partitions. Is there really any advantage to going directly to /boot/loader, rather than simply chaining?