From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 11 7:12:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464A237B438; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:12:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from dwcjr (dwcjr [192.168.0.216]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0353319AFB; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:12:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <007401c19ab2$57cea060$d800a8c0@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Alan Eldridge" Cc: , "FreeBSD Ports List" References: <20020111145849.GB36269@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <005901c19ab0$fd4eb540$d800a8c0@inethouston.net> <20020111150528.GA37042@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Subject: Re: whether to back out Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:12:11 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So what are you suggesting for the depends? > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:02:29AM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > >I'll leave it in for a while and see if I get any one complaining. Either > >way I'll reconsider before the ports freeze. Whichever way I change it, I > >get a few emails the next day telling me how the other way won't work, but > >nobody can test it and see if its broken. > > I definitely confirmed the breakage. > > Whether we *need* a RUN_DEPENDS is open. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message