From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 15 10:15:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40C09AD; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D36CF7; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:d051:3b46:4a53:4fdc]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38D2D4AC57; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:15:38 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:15:36 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <951943801.20130415141536@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Mark Martinec Subject: Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer In-Reply-To: <201304150025.07337.Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> References: <20130411201805.GD76816@FreeBSD.org> <20130414160648.GD96431@in-addr.com> <36562.1365960622.5652758659450863616@ffe10.ukr.net> <201304150025.07337.Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:15:41 -0000 Hello, Mark. You wrote 15 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 2:25:07: >> Yes! This is the most clever thought in this thread. Why we need 3 >> firewalls? Two packet filters it's excess too. We have two packet filter= s: >> one with excellent syntax and functionality but with outdated bandwidth >> control mechanism (aka ALTQ); another - with nice traffic >> shaper/prioritization (dummynet)/classification (diffused) but with >> complicated implementation in not trivial tasks. May be the next step >> will be discussion about one packet filter in the system?.. MM> ... and as far as I can tell none of them is currently usable MM> on an IPv6-only FreeBSD (like protecting a host with sshguard), MM> none of them supports stateful NAT64, nor IPv6 prefix translation :( IPv6 prefix translation?! AGAIN!? FML. I've thought, that IPv6 will render all that NAT nightmare to void. I hope, IPv6 prefix translation will not be possible never ever! --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov