Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Nov 1997 17:05:51 -0500 (EST)
From:      Charles Owens <owensc@enc.edu>
To:        Craig Johnston <caj@praline.no.neosoft.com>
Cc:        questions list FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: full file system: df and du disagree - why?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971114170529.14249M-100000@itsdsv2.enc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.971114152907.13922C-100000@praline.no.neosoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Craig Johnston wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Charles Owens wrote:
> 
> > A 'du -ks /var' showed that only 11 out of 60 megs were in use, so I
> > _knew_ that there was plenty of free space.  But, df didn't think so, and
> > the kernel apparantly didn't think so either, as writes to /var still
> > produced a filesystem full error. 
> 
> Some process has a file that has been rm'ed open, likely.  The file is not
> actually deleted until the last process that has it open closes it.  Du will
> report the space as unused, df will report correctly.
> 
> Craig A. Johnston, Applications Engineer, NeoSoft, Inc.
> caj@neosoft.com  phone:(504)539 9235  fax:(504)539 9236

Thanks!  Could you define "rm'd open" ?

Thanks,
---
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Charles N. Owens                               Email:  owensc@enc.edu
                                             http://www.enc.edu/~owensc
  Network & Systems Administrator
  Information Technology Services  "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's
  Eastern Nazarene College         best friend.  Inside of a dog it's 
                                   too dark to read." - Groucho Marx
-------------------------------------------------------------------------




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.971114170529.14249M-100000>