From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 21 13:48:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A049F1065670; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:48:26 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20090621134826.GA44901@FreeBSD.org> References: <200906191552.n5JFqZcG047705@svn.freebsd.org> <20090620130238.N29302@delplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090620130238.N29302@delplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Brooks Davis , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194493 - head/usr.bin/catman X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:48:27 -0000 Bruce Evans wrote: > I've never seen a machine that actually runs catman. I remove the > cat directories on all my machines to prevent any saving of cat > pages. All FreeBSD cluster machines that I checked (just 3) have > 0, 1 and 2 saved cat pages. This shows shows that catman isn't run > on them and that root rarely looks at man pages on them. This kinda brings up the question, do we actually need catman(1) at all these days of fast CPU and disks and plenty of RAM? ./danfe