From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed May 16 10:56: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.akalink.com (akalink.com [64.23.81.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74B7037B424
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jfortin@akalink.com)
Received: (qmail 94527 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 17:54:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO node00) (64.23.81.14)
  by akalink.com with SMTP; 16 May 2001 17:54:08 -0000
Message-ID: <00f001c0de31$3006f520$020a10ac@node00>
Reply-To: "Jonathan Fortin" <jfortin@akalink.com>
From: "Jonathan Fortin" <jfortin@akalink.com>
To: "David Greenman" <dg@root.com>
Cc: <questions@freebsd.org>
References: <15105.44534.131385.573668@onceler.kciLink.com> <x78zjx9oww.fsf@onceler.kciLink.com> <20010516104821.A19893@nexus.root.com>
Subject: Re: dual fxp ethernet, one doesn't "work"
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:53:59 -0400
Organization: Akalink Communications
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This looks like their both on the same mac address.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Greenman" <dg@root.com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <khera@kcilink.com>
Cc: <stable@freebsd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: dual fxp ethernet, one doesn't "work"


> >>>>>> "VK" == Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> writes:
> >
> >VK> Box name "m02":
> >
> >VK> [m02]% ifconfig -a
> >VK> fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> >VK>         inet 192.168.200.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast
192.168.200.255
> >VK>         ether 00:b0:d0:e1:34:de
> >VK>         media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
> >VK>         supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
> >VK> fxp1: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu
1500
> >VK>         inet 192.168.100.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast
192.168.100.255
> >VK>         ether 00:b0:d0:e1:34:df
> >VK>         media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active
> >VK>         supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
> >VK> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
> >VK>         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> >
> >Ok... more data.  It is definitely a FreeBSD problem with dual fxp
> >NICs.
> >
> >Evidence:
> >
> >I swapped the cables and IP numbers for fxp1 and fxp0.  Now, fxp1
> >works and fxp0 doesn't.  That is, the interface I assign to
> >192.168.100.2 doesn't work, but the one assinged 192.168.200.64 works
> >fine.  The order in which they are assigned doesn't matter.
> >
> >Is there some magic to the 192.168.100.2 address?
>
>    Can you provide us with the output of 'netstat -rna'?
>
> -DG
>
> David Greenman
> Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
> President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com
> Pave the road of life with opportunities.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message