Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:17:44 +0100 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> To: mike@karels.net Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Schedule for releases Message-ID: <AED6562D-668E-455F-8204-C9A8F02B266D@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <201012221745.oBMHj7Wg039593@mail.karels.net> References: <201012221745.oBMHj7Wg039593@mail.karels.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-2--682631634 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Mike, Den 22/12/2010 kl. 18.45 skrev Mike Karels: > - Those of us doing backports could probably do a better job of > sharing the results. On the other hand, I'm generally backporting > to a specific release (currently 6.3 or 7.2) rather than -stable, > and we're testing our software rather than FreeBSD. Thanks for taking the time to write your comments. What strikes me is = that we may have lots of non-FreeBSD developers working to backport = stuff in their own private trees. Possibly a lot of redundant work is = being done. Even though you're backporting to a specific release, and even though = you're only testing the work via your own software, would it not help = others and possibly even yourself if this FreeBSD-specific work lands in = the FreeBSD repository instead of your private tree? In my view you're = just as much a FreeBSD developer as people with commit access that are = scratching their own itches in CURRENT. Erik= --Apple-Mail-2--682631634--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AED6562D-668E-455F-8204-C9A8F02B266D>