From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 17:15:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62A116A4B3 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EA643FD7 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:15:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9P0Dmp64687; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:13:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:13:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Lukas Ertl In-Reply-To: <20031025010928.V846@korben.in.tern> Message-ID: <20031024201256.G43805-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Felix von Leitner cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please help me tune FreeBSD for bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:15:54 -0000 On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Felix von Leitner wrote: > > > Please also tell me if you have suggestions for other benchmarks that > > say something about the scalability of an operating system, that I could > > (and should) include in my benchmark suite. > > If you have some spare time, I'd really be interested in how the new > SCHED_ULE scheduler compares against the traditional (default) SCHED_4BSD > scheduler (although SCHED_ULE has been designed for SMP, some UP results > are sure nice to have). ULE has developed some performance problems. I'm not sure where they came from but I will be working on it in the next few weeks. Until then I wouldn't recommend any benchmarking with it unless the CPU affinity will really be a huge win. > > Regarding performance tuning: did you already look at accf_http(9) and/or > accf_data(9)? (Although it would probably need some rewrite of your > code...) > > regards, > le > > -- > Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at > UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 > Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 > University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >