From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 09:47:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C5537B401 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stone.locallink.net (Stone.LocalLink.Net [65.170.77.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAA043FCB for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:47:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kpitcher@locallink.net) Received: from 65.170.77.2 (av.LocalLink.Net [65.170.77.8]) by viruscanner.locallink.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 76E2A41E5F for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:47:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by stone.locallink.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1509041DDF; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:47:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamond (Diamond.LocalLink.Net [65.170.77.68]) by stone.locallink.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7305841D1F for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:47:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Keith Pitcher" To: Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:47:18 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c33c02$9b18c9c0$444daa41@diamond> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: 5.1 install - Slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:47:32 -0000 I'm doing a net install of 5.1 on an AMD K5 100, 16 megs ram. 2 gig HD, put 128MB for swap. I know this is basically bare minimum, but it's only going to be a modem gateway. I started this around 2am, it is now bogged down on adding the perl package. So far it has about 5.5 megs downloaded and it's just creaping. It's been on this same package for 8 hours and the install is just creeping on up on the install size. I doubt this is net congestion and blame it on the slow machine. My question is : should it take quite this long? I originally let it run for 2 hours, thought it was locked up and restarted, see if it would speed up. But this new install is slowing down at the same spot. This is a new personal record for taking the longest to install. Thanks, Keith