From owner-freebsd-tokenring Wed Jun 24 21:39:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA15106 for freebsd-tokenring-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 21:39:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-tokenring@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA14872; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 21:38:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA12290; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:37:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: "Larry S. Lile" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tokenring@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timeout/untimeout differences in porting from Mach? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-tokenring@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Larry S. Lile wrote: > Does anyone have the man pages for timeout/untimeout for Mach? > I am working on the interrupt code for the IBM token-ring card > and don't really understand what the mach code was trying to > do. It looks a bit strange compared to fbsd. If I'm not mistaken its the same purpose as the ifp->if_watchdog routine. The if code calls this depending on the setting of ifp->if_timer. See net/if.c in if_slowtimo() /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-tokenring" in the body of the message