From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:27:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E77106566B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [216.194.67.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E5A8FC13 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (c-76-28-47-52.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [76.28.47.52]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61A4284BA for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:27:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (unknown [10.23.90.40]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA11FBBE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:27:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:26:58 -0500 From: "Mike." To: "FreeBSD" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:27:01 -0000 On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote: |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 |Alessandro Baggi articulated: | |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? | |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards. | |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS |world. ============= It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :)