From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mon Jan 6 10:44:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC431D09C8 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from mail.kronometrix.org (mail.kronometrix.org [95.85.46.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.kronometrix.org", Issuer "mail.kronometrix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47rsZ65gGsz4YHc for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.172] (82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.kronometrix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 006Ahud4008312 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:43:57 GMT (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.kronometrix.org: Host 82-203-141-23.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.141.23] claimed to be [192.168.1.172] From: Stefan Parvu Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Xen performance on FreeBSD vs Linux Message-Id: <7E9802F1-172A-41A7-A110-C69A7D8D1192@kronometrix.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:43:51 +0200 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47rsZ65gGsz4YHc X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sparvu@kronometrix.org designates 95.85.46.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sparvu@kronometrix.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.28 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.59)[-0.588,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-xen@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.50)[-0.497,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kronometrix.org]; IP_SCORE(0.61)[ip: (0.38), ipnet: 95.85.0.0/18(1.01), asn: 14061(1.69), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:95.85.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:44:00 -0000 Hi, How Xen hypervisor compares in terms of performance (guest) on FreeBSD = vs Linux , using ZFS or UFS ? Are there any benchmarks or tests regarding this ? Thanks Stefan Parvu sparvu@kronometrix.org