From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 29 02:09:18 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E9E106564A
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arubtsov@parallels.com)
Received: from mail3.plesk.ru (gw-swsoft2.ll-nsk.zsttk.ru [82.200.65.190])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAF38FC1C
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:09:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arubtsov@parallels.com)
Received: by mail3.plesk.ru (Postfix, from userid 426)
	id 045801A9C22; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:09:01 +0700 (NOVST)
Received: from rubtsov.plesk.ru (rubtsov.plesk.ru [192.168.62.206])
	by mail3.plesk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDCE1A9C04
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:09:00 +0700 (NOVST)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:10:00 +0700
From: Alexey Rubtsov <arubtsov@parallels.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20080429091000.43abb7b1@rubtsov.plesk.ru>
Organization: Parallels
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Fw: Practices for naming packages compiled from ports.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:09:18 -0000



Hi,

Sorry to previous spam. 

I'm trying to compile package from port systitis/pecl-fileinfo and was
some saddened. This package consists depend to php, but name of
compiled package was pecl-fileinfo for either php version. 

In answer to my bug to this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123063

I get that so names for packages "it's not a bug, it's common
practice".

I didn't understand this practice. Why i can't to compile the same
package with several names by included dependencies into package.
In the same time i see many php extensions with php4- or php5- prefix
into package name which detected by php version installed into system. 

The same problem is exists for apache too. I can't to compile php
package for various apache versions but with different package names. 

I want to have possibility to create myself package repository with both
php and apache versions.

-- 
Alexey Rubtsov
E-mail: arubtsov@parallels.com
WebSite: http://www.parallels.com