From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 12:20:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583E81065679 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from k@kevinkevin.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265988FC08 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so1850570iyj.13 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.217.132 with SMTP id hm4mr1271245icb.93.1298377246394; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from kkPC (not.enough.unixsluts.com [76.10.166.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d21sm6204308ibg.15.2011.02.22.04.20.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:20:42 -0800 (PST) From: "kevin" To: "'Tom Judge'" References: <000c01cbcf94$35e76e20$a1b64a60$@com> <4D5FAC16.7080207@gmx.com> <00a201cbd03f$2bdc3540$83949fc0$@com> <4D5FD91F.20704@gmx.com> <4D5FDCF1.6050909@gmx.com> <00a501cbd04f$2276b5b0$67642110$@com> <4D5FFE9C.30005@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <4D5FFE9C.30005@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:20:36 -0500 Message-ID: <003f01cbd28a$ea03d2b0$be0b7810$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: AcvQWvebJ/t04wk6Qr+mKJ8/6bZOlgCLzM0g Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, 'Nikos Vassiliadis' Subject: RE: Bridging + VLANS + RSTP / MSTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:20:47 -0000 >There is a also the caveat: The switch will probably _not_ forward the STP BPDU's from one port to another. You were correct -- my initial testing confirmed this. Would the same issue arise if I employed a gateway IP on the /bridge/ instead, and used CARP as a failover mechanism? The firewall no longer becomes transparent pass through/firewall. I have not done carp with bridges and I'm not 100% certain the same STP forwarding problems wouldn't arise, even with an IP assigned. Such as : [switch 1 (vlan 1)] | | [fw1 gw1] -- CARP -- [fw2 gw1] | | [switch 1 (vlan 2)] Thanks, Kevin