From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org  Tue Nov 29 08:34:05 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8F9C5C566
 for <freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4155619C7
 for <freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uAT8Y4I4095027
 for <freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:34:05 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 214863] lang/gcc + libc++ may fail due to spurious
 __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length reference
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:34:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: mat@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gerald@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-214863-29464-kO8FWxgQQk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-214863-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-214863-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain
 <freebsd-toolchain.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:34:05 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214863

--- Comment #6 from Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> ---
Up until a branch is out of support, it should get all the EN/SA that we
promise. So any EN/SA that comes out before January 1st should include 10.1=
 and
10.2 (and 9.3 if applicable)

Now, after the support runs out, we should really not support them any more,
otherwise, people will start expecting our EOL to be automatically extended,
and I am not sure secteam@ or re@ has the manpower to handle that.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=