From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 29 22:50:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D552E891;
 Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:50:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BAE1F08;
 Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:50:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from study64.tdx.co.uk (study64.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.231])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id s0TMnw1O092845
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:49:59 GMT
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:49:58 +0000
From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk>
To: Jay West <jwest@ezwind.net>, "'Mark Felder'" <feld@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD 10.0-R as Xen 'guest' - clarification?
Message-ID: <F2F434DFF1DF4F003FA1AED1@study64.tdx.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <001101cf1d44$080b1780$18214680$@ezwind.net>
References: <18819F918745D984B618D518@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk>
 <1391023465.31000.76904101.03DD98B3@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <001101cf1d44$080b1780$18214680$@ezwind.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:50:09 -0000



--On 29 January 2014 16:47:03 -0600 Jay West <jwest@ezwind.net> wrote:

> I guess I could try it and see.... but is it also true that we no longer
> have to do the dance with removing the cd/dvd drive and fixing fstab for
> ad0 device naming convention?

I use gpt anyway so that fortunately has never really hurt us.

> And what about the NO_ADAPTIVE _* kernel options - not needed?

That's the bit I'm interested in - whether they're still needed or not...

Our previous Xen guests use the xe-guest-utilities - I was just making sure 
they're still needed / current now that FBSD 10 is out.

-Karl