Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:49:58 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: Jay West <jwest@ezwind.net>, "'Mark Felder'" <feld@freebsd.org>, freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD 10.0-R as Xen 'guest' - clarification? Message-ID: <F2F434DFF1DF4F003FA1AED1@study64.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <001101cf1d44$080b1780$18214680$@ezwind.net> References: <18819F918745D984B618D518@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <1391023465.31000.76904101.03DD98B3@webmail.messagingengine.com> <001101cf1d44$080b1780$18214680$@ezwind.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 29 January 2014 16:47:03 -0600 Jay West <jwest@ezwind.net> wrote: > I guess I could try it and see.... but is it also true that we no longer > have to do the dance with removing the cd/dvd drive and fixing fstab for > ad0 device naming convention? I use gpt anyway so that fortunately has never really hurt us. > And what about the NO_ADAPTIVE _* kernel options - not needed? That's the bit I'm interested in - whether they're still needed or not... Our previous Xen guests use the xe-guest-utilities - I was just making sure they're still needed / current now that FBSD 10 is out. -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F2F434DFF1DF4F003FA1AED1>