From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Dec 22  9:10:32 2000
From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 22 09:10:30 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F7C37B400
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.com 
	by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 149Vi7-0004h7-03; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:10:27 +0100
Received: from neutron.cichlids.com (520050424122-0001@[62.225.195.200]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 149VhP-1QuZRgC; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:09:43 +0100
Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10])
	by neutron.cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ACC9EAB0C; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:09:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by cichlids.cichlids.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B753114A72; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:09:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:09:26 +0100
To: David Lebel <lebel@lebel.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: (fwd) ports/23298: New port: lame-devel 3.87
Message-ID: <20001222180926.A3930@cichlids.cichlids.com>
Mail-Followup-To: alex@cichlids.cichlids.com, David Lebel <lebel@lebel.org>,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20001222113622.A24195@lebel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20001222113622.A24195@lebel.org>; from lebel@lebel.org on Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:36:22AM -0500
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8  A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F
X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de
X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung.
From: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer)
X-Sender: 520050424122-0001@t-dialin.net
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Thus spake David Lebel (lebel@lebel.org):

> I didn't receive any feedback from this new port.  Is there any chance
> that it'll get commited?  lame 3.87 adds quite a few new features and
> is a lot faster than the current version.  If there is something wrong
> with my port, please let me know.

Two general things:

1.) Is there really a need for a -devel version in the tree, too?

2.) since we already have audio/lame, you should better produce a diff
against this version, SINCE the audio/lame will be repo-copied.

do a diff -rNu lame lame-devel

Thanks

Alex


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message