From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 18 18:56:08 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22C016A400
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:56:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au)
Received: from mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au
	[211.29.133.168])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074BB43D55
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:56:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au)
Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org
	(c220-239-19-236.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.19.236])
	by mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k3IIu5xm025718
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:56:05 +1000
Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1])
	by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3IIu5jh002931;
	Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:56:05 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
	by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k3IIu5oH002930;
	Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:56:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:56:04 +1000
From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20060418185604.GA694@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References: <4444EE93.9050003@seclark.us>
	<20060418143122.GB76356@home.c0mplx.org>
	<44450BFB.1090705@seclark.us> <44451A54.1080509@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44451A54.1080509@gmx.de>
X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us, stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 losing mbufs!!!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:56:08 -0000

On Tue, 2006-Apr-18 18:56:52 +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>4.9 and 4.11 are on the same branch, thus of course, userland programs
>don't require recompilation.

"shouldn't" not "don't".  This would still require regression testing
to confirm that nothing breaks.  Given that Steve has stated that he
intends to migrate to 6.1 shortly, he probably wants to avoid an
unnecessary round of regression testing.

-- 
Peter Jeremy