From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 30 22:54:39 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0933106564A;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CD78FC08;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:54:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3UMsd34006363;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3UMscdx006362;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:54:38 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20120430225438.GB60636@dragon.NUXI.org>
Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>,
	Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, toolchain@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20120426093548.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<5BCE2E77-2B45-43B7-AB1F-6E6C13B87B34@gid.co.uk>
	<20120428031212.GE80419@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<D92D6EA0-62F5-42A9-A802-8CF0D43A4D62@gid.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D92D6EA0-62F5-42A9-A802-8CF0D43A4D62@gid.co.uk>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, toolchain@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:54:40 -0000

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:03:17AM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Yes. You to have a statically linked /rescue/sh on board, so what's the
> point of /bin/sh being dynamic?

While you and I agree on this, the primary reason we went with a
dynamically linked root was for PAM and NSS support -- which are
dlopen'ed.  And thus requires using a shared libc.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)