From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 16 7: 8:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu (broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu [128.84.247.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A2915465 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 07:08:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU) Received: from graphics.cornell.edu (localhost.graphics.cornell.edu) by broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA162320892; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:08:13 -0400 Message-Id: <199909161408.AA162320892@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Daniel Folkinshteyn , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proftpd In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:06:47 +0200." <60086.937480007@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:08:12 -0400 From: Mitch Collinsworth Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> is the newest version of proftpd (1.2.0pre6) still vulnerable? > >Shouldn't you be asking the proftpd people that question? I know that >the version in the ports tree is still vulnerable. Vulnerable to _what_? Could someone provide a reference here? -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message