From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jun 8 9:45:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.sysadmin-inc.com (ns2.sysadmin-inc.com [209.16.228.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96B3D37B405 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:45:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@sysadmin-inc.com) Received: (qmail 57650 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2001 16:45:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO w2kstest) (10.10.1.70) by ns2.sysadmin-inc.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 16:45:17 -0000 From: "Peter Brezny" To: Subject: security and FrontPage 2000 extensions on apache. Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:44:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Digging around in the archives, I've found a lot of comments about the insecure nature of fp extensions, but sometimes not a lot of meat to back up the arguement. I'm running an old 2.2.8 server with fp98 extensions on it. Have the fp2000 extensions tightened up the security any more? Do they install more easily? General comments? TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message