From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  6 11:28:03 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282516A4DD
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  6 Sep 2006 11:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com)
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C5C43D49
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  6 Sep 2006 11:28:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com)
Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78])
	by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A1958830;
	Wed,  6 Sep 2006 07:28:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net
	[68.58.232.106])
	by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8041BD2DCE4;
	Wed,  6 Sep 2006 07:28:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1GKvZZ-0004n2-00; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 07:28:01 -0400
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:28:01 -0400
From: stan <stanb@panix.com>
To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20060906112801.GA18299@teddy.fas.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>,
	Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
References: <20060906105906.GA17195@teddy.fas.com>
	<B8A85846D3F4D84D18B36200@Unsupported>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B8A85846D3F4D84D18B36200@Unsupported>
X-Editor: gVim
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23
X-Uptime: 07:23:32 up 142 days, 8:28, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Stan Brown <stanb@panix.com>
Cc: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Acepting lnown "bad" mail?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:28:03 -0000

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> 
> --On 06 September 2006 06:59 -0400 stan <stanb@panix.com> wrote:
> 
> >What's going on is that the local sendmail on the new machine is rejecting
> >these mails. Like this
> >
> >Sep  6 06:50:43 brown sm-mta[12249]: k86Ai3w8012249: ruleset=check_mail,
> >arg1=<r oot@AW0001.meadwestvaco.com>, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1],
> >reject=451 4.1.8 Doma in of sender address root@AW0001.meadwestvaco.com
> >does not resolve S
> >
> >Now I _know_ this is a laformed header, but, (at least right now), I'd
> >like for sendmail to just take the mail, without being so picky about it.
> >Is there a rule I can tweak to accomplish this?
> 
> Not really a FreeBSD question ;)
> 
> Having said that, you probably need to look at adding:
> 
>  FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains
> 
> In your sendmail config...
> 
Thanks, I'll give that a try.

-- 
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)