From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 26 22:23:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA19534 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from magigimmix.xs4all.nl (magigimmix.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.25]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA19529 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from plm.xs4all.nl (asd-isdn01-05.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.46.6]) by magigimmix.xs4all.nl (8.7.6/XS4ALL) with ESMTP id HAA29827 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 07:23:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from plm@localhost) by plm.xs4all.nl (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA03059; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:43:04 +0100 (MET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel PPP or ijPPP References: <87u3o4du58.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> From: Peter Mutsaers Date: 26 Jan 1997 22:43:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: Stephane Raimbault's message of Sun, 26 Jan 1997 09:20:43 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <87d8usdsew.fsf@localhost.xs4all.nl> Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.39/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> On Sun, 26 Jan 1997 09:20:43 -0600 (CST), Stephane Raimbault >> said: SR> What is the difference between the Kernel's PPP and ijppp. Is SR> their an advantage over one another? I like kernel PPP better. Probably it is also more efficient. At least it can start a script when the link comes up. ijppp doesn't seem to do that. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust is a good quality plm@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands | for other people to have