From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 13 19:18:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA11996 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 13 May 1998 19:18:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ftp1.mfn.org (ftp1.mfn.org [204.238.179.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA11981 for ; Wed, 13 May 1998 19:18:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@ftp1.mfn.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by ftp1.mfn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA01596 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 May 1998 21:17:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from root) Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 21:17:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Charlie Root Message-Id: <199805140217.VAA01596@ftp1.mfn.org> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IPFW Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is this a legal construct? ipfw add allow all tcp from 10.0.0.0:255.0.0.0 to any tcp 23 the idea being to allow any tcp based packets from my (obviously ficticious) net to any other, provided that these packets have a destination port of 23? (outbound telnet - and yes, I realize there is a LOT more to it, I'm just not familiar with IPFW syntax, and wanted to check it before I go ahead)... Thanks J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message