Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:18:03 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Cc: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Confusing smartd messages Message-ID: <5B3DD43B.5010208@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <201807050425.w654PlLu046202@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201807050425.w654PlLu046202@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
05.07.2018 11:25, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>> It would of also been nice if the ata standard would of made a way >>> to get the LBA of pending sectors so that a very quick rewrite attempt >>> could be done to fix them. IIRC this info is avalible, but in a vendor >>> specific way. >> >> "smartctl -t long" reveals LBA of first pending sector. > > That is vendor dependent Have not seen any exceptions with modern (e.g. last 5 years) HDDs. > and well only return the pending sector > if the pending sector fails for most vendors. It may fix the > sector if it could read it. This is first time I hear about fixind sector problem by just reading it. I believed that only a write can fix it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B3DD43B.5010208>