From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 5 07:12:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA15258 for current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 07:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sumatra.americantv.com (sumatra.americantv.com [207.170.17.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA15249 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from right.PCS (right.PCS [148.105.10.31]) by sumatra.americantv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA06055; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:46:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: (jlemon@localhost) by right.PCS (8.6.13/8.6.4) id JAA28320; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:14:11 -0500 Message-ID: <19970605091410.05359@right.PCS> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:14:10 -0500 From: Jonathan Lemon To: mika ruohotie Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: page fault References: <19970604174918.CS56609@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199706050940.MAA27014@shadows.aeon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.61.1 In-Reply-To: <199706050940.MAA27014@shadows.aeon.net>; from mika ruohotie on Jun 06, 1997 at 12:40:12PM +0300 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Jun 06, 1997 at 12:40:12PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote: > > > yes, but i failed to get kernel -g:ed. i guess after this i'll use > > > the 'config -g' as default. > > Be careful to not accidentally load this bloated kernel into > > memory. :) Also, i found the time ld(1) requires to link a full -g > > it's only about 9 mgs. why not? it's still less than what win95/nt4.0 > eats when started... besides, i didnt notice slowing (which it probably > causes). memory is cheap. Because it takes an unholy amount of time to load any LKM's into such a gigantic kernel. I don't think I had the patience to wait enough for the mod_load to complete. -- Jonathan