From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Sep  7 18:39:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA25121
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 18:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [207.67.172.194])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA25111
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 18:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (shawn@localhost)
	by luke.cpl.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA00257;
	Sun, 7 Sep 1997 18:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 18:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shawn Ramsey <shawn@luke.cpl.net>
To: Stavros Patiniotis <stavros@esc.net.au>
cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com>,
        "Adam L. Simpson" <adam@netsonic.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Spammers Relay/use of SMTP
In-Reply-To: <199709070630.QAA27261@bang.esc.net.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970907183706.241A-100000@luke.cpl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If you would like, I can post a *really* nice set of rule sets, which will
> allow you to specify a (group of) host which can relay through your system
> in the format of Class A,B,C or individually.  All the rulesets that where
> listed in the sendmail pages required you to individually list each host!
> (a pain in the ***).  Another really nice ruleset is the DNS lookup one in
> which the RCPT address must resolve ;)

Please do. Always interested in the best ways to stop spam. :) Although
since implementing the ruleset that we are using now, spam has been
drastically cut down.