From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 14:28:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D95016A4C0 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177C943FDD for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20030828212139013008mce2e>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:21:39 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7SLLcN9048172 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:21:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h7SLLblA048169; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:21:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <006001c36da5$5b83c6a0$04fea8c0@moe> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Aug 2003 17:21:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <006001c36da5$5b83c6a0$04fea8c0@moe> Message-ID: <44fzjlo4v2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Scroll back in console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:28:03 -0000 "Charles Howse" writes: > Well, Duuhhhhh! > The reason I didn't think about scroll lock is that it is the key that > is mapped to my kvm. I hit Scroll Lock twice and the number of the > computer I want to switch to. > > Familiarity breeds contempt, I guess. I realize this is supposed to be a heretical, insulting suggestion, but you could always try reading the manual. syscons(4) describes it quite clearly, in a section titled "back scrolling."