From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 21:21:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B881065672 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7E38FC0A for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so1739443pbb.13 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q4DKJnoA/diK+rjlqCr1l1NPOFBKyIiOe0L+NFAzqUE=; b=QNUcgGYFdvg5kbN8zKr0D1AE5ia4xZtSElq9NRQBxzlS4uSwVrjO5W8G4BtEVzVN7I 8kcA1fL70twt/wPu4dfC6ta5ryJAk0CqAD9olVbAWPft4pZL1Kw/wbvJAr+AujNsf2JA Ooi6ecHqnU6orKNB6TM2ce2ILipUo2knZmTuPGQWxLP/6whBkiLkPtcxaKyf+SpeXQNC 2uVmEHA9WrENtdevpG01YqicfBLOUuHRN6QRW1F3hBsBiM8UnKMub6oIsF0zCrZBnd/e 4wFsK9m0z4aBwNJQOpXo+SqyKP8xWAd0LjbQCvWu24+jNWC3T2GQCX/n2RbMD3AD2W1n FoFQ== Received: by 10.68.224.70 with SMTP id ra6mr13925900pbc.11.1339104092858; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pe2sm5303706pbc.59.2012.06.07.14.21.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD11C72.6000708@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:26:10 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120606182153.3cc2ee07.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:21:33 -0000 On 06/06/2012 01:35 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > But this is more to do with the BIOS than with Intel as such. Wasn't > there a FreeBIOS, later LinuxBIOS, now coreboot I believe..? > So replacing the BIOS entirely wouldn't suffice to override all this nonsense? > _______________________________________________ anybody will be free to disable secure boot in x86 systems and run any OS, so this is not really a big deal.