Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 19:49:19 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.autotools.mk Message-ID: <40C2079F.6000506@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <1086457288.39047.21.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <200406041727.i54HRTmW022406@repoman.freebsd.org> <40C1FF1F.8050807@fillmore-labs.com> <1086457288.39047.21.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V so, 05. 06. 2004 v 19:13, Oliver Eikemeier p=ED=B9e: >=20 >=20 >>> Steps 3 and 4 now essentially negate the need for any kind of >>> direct dependency within a non-autotools port Makefile on >>> devel/autoconf*, devel/automake*, devel/libtool*, and devel/libltdl.= >> >>So, can we now remove >> >>- devel/autoconf253 >>- devel/automake15 >>- devel/libltdl15 >> >>as they serve no useful purpose and are not connected to the build >>anyway? >=20 > You get it all wrong, eik. We want to ultimately remove non-versed > versions, ie devel/autoconf, devel/automake, devel/libltdl Whatever, then remove those. Where is the benefit of having both in the repository? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C2079F.6000506>