From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 15 14:06:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21070 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:06:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mercury.webnology.com (mercury.webnology.com [209.155.51.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA21065 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:06:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jooji@webnology.com) Received: from localhost (jooji@localhost) by mercury.webnology.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id QAA04719; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:06:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:06:02 -0600 (CST) From: "Jasper O'Malley" To: CNNet cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990115140810.00821ae0@cnnet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, CNNet wrote: > The patch applies fine but when we go to build it we get nothing but errors. > > Could someone look into this and tell us why? Post the errors. > If we take the binary from the above site and install it on the 3.0 machine > radius works but accounting doesn't work. How, precisely, do things not work? > We have checked the port and they are correct on both machines 1645 and 1646 > > I noticed that on bsd 3.0 in services that radius was set to ports 1812 and > 1813 we commented these out and changed them to 1645 and 1646 This is per the RFCs (RFC2138 and RFC2139). The ports chosen by Livingston/Lucent were chosen in error; they've become the de facto standards, unfortunately, but real standards exist :) Cheers, Mick The Reverend Jasper P. O'Malley dotdot:jooji@webnology.com Systems Administrator ringring:asktheadmiral Webnology, LLC woowoo:http://www.webnology.com/~jooji To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message