From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 8 9:38:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (sagami148234.allnet.ne.jp [210.251.148.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E94B14DC8; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from ebina.hitachi.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id CAA16033; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:38:34 +0900 (JST) From: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Message-Id: <200001081738.CAA16033@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:38:34 +0900 (JST) To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Re: IPv6-enable ports In-Reply-To: <23769.947339891@coconut.itojun.org> References: <23769.947339891@coconut.itojun.org> X-Mailer: xcite1.31> Mew version 1.95b10 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org itojun> Do you think you need USE_INET6 (or something like this), to provide itojun> fallback to IPv4-only port? or can we just make them IPv6 ready itojun> without any switches? In some cases, USE_INET6 is necessary because ports-current support both of 3-STABLE and current tree now. For example, in ports/net/zebra, ospf6d and ripngd, which are IPv6 routing daemon modules, are not installed by 'configure' detection on 3-STABLE environment. We need to prepare the difference PLISTs on 3-STABLE and current. It's like the relation between aout and elf in past days. --- Munechika SUMIKAWA @ KAME Project / FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message