From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 19:13:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765C916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAB843D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AC0222404 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85576-12 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F3F222401 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:52 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:50 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:13:54 -0000 --nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: > If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do > it. Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10= =20 times the changes? Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason in the worl= d=20 why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of ports=20 from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap today? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDckpu5sRg+Y0CpvERAvCiAKCUOFm98Qwf4GtkAaM5OZlbzZ2jJwCfbN4k CRiNlprzGiLIyiROiSzuKrQ= =pYMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce--