From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 14:55:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D32716A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDB913C469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so834855nzn for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:55:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=gk04Uj46KQwE6L5qOl8B8AHKFs0aoEUEnNF5aQse/hNsB7AX1OlSYVLiNB50Uf7ht1jBX6z4F/kESL37EvtaTOa7xKROBMQBhF6I0J9tC9MzzTrpg9WVV+u/jHZQ8MNageVMil9/L9l425GkYqzmcY65GeDjtcz8AvLOBZe2lP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uF0uWDlse0g09HZZTpToxA8+xJDgjrBgv58j3D33FloeIxojHnDICVQKCsJlvdx/KrkSpaJcDoNeBRmYhIUYnswfYZPHPd+15uA11VmoN2UdMc8sBg+hHc71LLWU1gQToDmmrGrG9jSWCAlytPELKRDlSKbLp5L4zW0WxxY6vkE= Received: by 10.114.14.1 with SMTP id 1mr3056224wan.1181919320907; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.194.13 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:55:20 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Kirill Ponomarew" In-Reply-To: <20070615135952.GE19707@voodoo.bawue.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706151319.l5FDJ3ZT002340@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070615135952.GE19707@voodoo.bawue.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9fa738d67987c4f8 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/ppracer Makefile pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:55:22 -0000 On 6/15/07, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Andrew, please stop sending such kind of comments to > ports-committers@ alias, in this case it really should be sent > privately. But, frankly speaking, even if I get it privately, I'd > smile. You should really *think* before you mail your comments to > ports-committers list, these above comments are inappropriate here. > > Please move all you technical items for commits whether to ports@ > and discuss it there, or privately, depending how *important* is > your comment. Inserting the coins for every commit and do it in > ports-committers@ is not what I expected while discussing technical > review explanations. I'm the one who sends most messages, but this is not a one-man effort. Many people read them, some comment on them - and we all learn. And this is the point: making committers aware of the amount of problems in our commits, discussing them together. I'm not an automated process, we must all learn from each other's mistakes, broadcasted to a list, because we just don't have enough human resources for private lessons. As for the mailing-list, I think ports-committers is the most appropriate one because this is primarily an inter-committer process. Also I think ports@ is inappropriate since it's largely user-oriented, and they don't need to be exposed to this.