From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 13 12:07:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F69C16A418 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from people.fsn.hu (people.fsn.hu [195.228.252.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8A313C442 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from japan.t-online.private (people [192.168.2.4]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E547A70A63; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:07:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47B2DD62.6020507@fsn.hu> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:06:58 +0100 From: Attila Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?SklOTUVJIFRhdHV5YSAvIOelnuaYjumBlOWTiQ==?= References: <475B0F3E.5070100@fsn.hu> <479DFE74.8030004@fsn.hu> <479F02A7.9020607@fsn.hu> <47A614E9.4030501@fsn.hu> <47A77A13.6010802@fsn.hu> <47B1D2F4.5070304@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, bind-users@isc.org Subject: Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:07:08 -0000 On 02/12/08 18:55, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > At Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:10:12 +0100, > Attila Nagy wrote: > > >>> Then named will listen on [your_ip_address]:some_port, and you can >>> browse internal statistics by accessing >>> http://[your_ip_address]:some_port with your browser. When you notice >>> the memory starts growing, retrieving the information several times, >>> and compare the "Memory" section at the end of the page. If the >>> memory hog is inside named, there should be significant growth in some >>> of the rows accordingly. >>> >>> >> Here are the results: >> http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/bind950-memory-20080212/ >> and at the end, the relevant line from top. >> >> Is this FreeBSD leaking then? >> > > Looking at the last stat > http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/bind950-memory-20080212/bind4 > even the total of "MaxUse" is about 69MB, while the ps output > indicates the resident size is 441MB. So, yes, there should be > something odd not directly related to the named's (normal) behavior. > > Can you try the same test with only one worker thread (by using the > '-n 1' command line option)? Then we may be able to chase the problem > further. > Of course. See the bindn1 files at the same location. (only the memory section included) The effect is pretty much the same. -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6758 http://www.fsn.hu/