From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 28 16:05:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA05707 for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA05688 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id IAA15934; Thu, 29 Aug 1996 08:34:48 +0930 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199608282304.IAA15934@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Is VME going to be considered with the DOS emulator? To: doon@eeyore.lv-hrc.nevada.edu Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 08:34:47 +0930 (CST) Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <32247A91.500E@hrc.nevada.edu> from "Harry Reed" at Aug 28, 96 09:57:53 am MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Harry Reed stands accused of saying: > > Hi, > With all of the renewed talk about the DOS emulator I was wondering if > the Pentium (tm) Virtual Mode Extensions (VME) were/are going to be > used? They seem to make vm86() much easier! Not while my test machine is a 386/40 8) If you're serious about it, grab Sean's patches and see how VME could Make Things Better... > Harry Reed -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[