From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 14 00:22:09 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C193331;
 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:22:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22b.google.com (mail-pd0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E91B1EB9;
 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:22:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z10so3125350pdj.2
 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:22:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dYY2qpRZE9sV8WnvPemCcJBXun/n9CrjOvZ+WfvD5BY=;
 b=MaNa1X+lXEOrb1a8G+MJnclbQTBF8xyPH3b9OAuJ64PKYFnCJU67+YR98Mh2HMzE+k
 uaGzlc9amjmlbgXM46T5p/BcZoCrSSg21v0NWxablZJQ94eWNhpWvXk2ViMkhnumjWP4
 blFZa/NFjJbLl4nyjfE8t4JUhHkOZYifVzFcfG7bidYexsTFsfvIM//4uUieD56HjTGO
 tJGxVMtzrwVw/EaIPeTN/Ckpq0pT9qX4J6oHBAucQFEg0rzbeQH26mNSidTRJObrWx97
 vYV4tSyGpz02/VlpRHNQaQjNEvAVJep3zaJPr4MHLNe//rDRRzDCWbf8FOgiiSPoiZif
 fVIw==
X-Received: by 10.66.221.199 with SMTP id qg7mr6547305pac.13.1386980528797;
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:22:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp. [134.160.214.42])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pa1sm10606647pac.17.2013.12.13.16.22.06
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:22:04 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20131214.092204.1657898379615247833.maho.nakata@gmail.com>
To: tijl@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
From: Nakata Maho <maho.nakata@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
References: <20131201150640.12ea18c8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <20131213011204.GA10879@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:58:53 +0000
Cc: me@janh.de, bapt@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org,
 stephen@FreeBSD.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:22:09 -0000

Many thanks!

From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:47:23 +0100

> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
>> I see the octave port is still broken.
>> 
>> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, 
>> reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
>> I'm see the original problem.
>> 
>> % octave
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>> 
>> PLEASE, commit your patch ASAP.
> 
> Committed in r336344.
>