From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec  3 16:34:23 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA09152
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 16:34:23 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA09140
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 16:34:09 -0800
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id QAA02292; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 16:34:00 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199512040034.QAA02292@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Nothing heard about JREMOD..
To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 16:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199512030633.XAA00233@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Dec 2, 95 11:33:42 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 868       
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> [
> I removed hackers from the list since we only need one mailing list,
> and -current is the most relevant.
> ]
> 
> Julian Elischer writes:
> > I assume this means no-one's having any problems?
> 
> I think it means no one has time yet to test the changes.  They have
> been in the tree 4 days now and every day I've seen more commit related
> to them go in, so I've been waiting for the commits to stabilize before
> I upgrade my 'experimental in-use' systems to the new code.  I haven't
> had time to try it out on my 'who cares if it crashes' system yet.

I've had a few responses..
No negative ones..
seems to be working for everyone..
 trouble is that people with no problems with it are not telling me..
they assume I ony want to here BAD NEWS ?

> 
> I think the code needs more time to get shaken out before you make it
> the default.
> 
> 
> Nate
>