From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 12 01:50:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1215A1065670 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xsappyx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979398FC21 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so1964306fxm.13 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:50:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MpXGeKTOdWE6btWeGhUCDMFNQD2I3McoJlxSMaLits4=; b=FkoktRh0AqXMcTuAuwEtWDseY0yat8rVAMsEtuOuUJ768caYrW5nTRVl25BZxXreaT AqBLAuxS1NrzWFD8rbzL25XfnFYpRBN16eE2W/g5Y45NKM6352MatbHrotEjTV/hdsTE u3oUSbRHtUd5RGS7ZvT66uosx+prGY/Os/Cmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PL7gGUq5OUm+gzyYN1Ip+wLAIism3CAAC2BXEcgw1uwczpJb1SwDQw3HcOk0fhKFGI Ify2Phz8sRmjga8U3ytNUsS+HhlldEGZ+jCtyLwgqPV5venPvNGs78W0efEZ+Gb6Ro/z ElPs5w0Bij2daiI7zAgHeSeRddiN/yO3/LvVg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.188.129 with SMTP id p1mr73972hbh.190.1265939454504; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:50:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B6ED119.2060308@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100207172150.GA59080@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4B6F4631.6050501@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100208150000.GA62607@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100208195807.GC8690@guilt.hydra> <87hbpqz8wp.fsf@kobe.laptop> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:50:54 -0800 Message-ID: <8206ae961002111750k55e33a0cu29bad4ee775a83bb@mail.gmail.com> From: xSAPPYx To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: alex Subject: Re: FreeBSD's UFS vs Ext4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:50:56 -0000 Using a phoronix link as an example, ext4 still has some pretty bad data loss bugs: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nzk0OA imo: data security of ufs > speed of ext4 ymmv