Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 09:50:14 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Cc: scrappy@hub.org, perlsta@fang.cs.sunyit.edu, james@wgold.demon.co.uk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...) Message-ID: <199704181650.JAA02155@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970417182959.00b2e9c0@etinc.com> from "dennis" at Apr 17, 97 06:30:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > nope, SMP support is alive and well in 3.0+. I believe its > >integrated as part of 3.0+...isn't it? But we've had SMP capabilities > >through patches since at least 2.2 > > Great. So the most powerful boxes can only be used by hackers and > not for any serious commercial purpose requiring stablilty.......didnt > we just have a (rather heated) discussion about this? Yes; as I recall, you were on the side that wanted to maintain stability through evolutionary developement of -RELEASE code, and the SMP people were all on the side which wanted to progress through revolution, not evolution. 8-p. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704181650.JAA02155>