From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Apr 3 18:30: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF52337B718 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f341U3a76666; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200104040130.f341U3a76666@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Brian Somers Subject: Re: docs/26293: Just add detail on the tutorial Reply-To: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/26293; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brian Somers To: Dima Dorfman Cc: Brian Somers , jrcharron@gen-int.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: docs/26293: Just add detail on the tutorial Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 02:28:12 +0100 > Brian Somers writes: > > Hi, > > > > Yes, these changes look good. The only caveat I'd mention is that > > the ``!include'' can appear without indents inside a section, but I > > think that's reasonably clear anyway.... > > Can it appear *with* indents, though? I don't want to screw people > over trying to use that. If it can appear either way, then it's > probably not worth mentioning it (bloat). If it must appear without > indents, a small notice somewhere may be in order so we people don't > pull their hair out because of that.. !include isn't allowed with indents :-/ > Thanks, > > Dima Dorfman > dima@unixfreak.org -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message