From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon Oct 23 08:41:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242A8E45B69 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1232D6850B for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v9N8fHPE010378 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:41:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223015] [tmpfs] [patch] tmpfs does not support sparse files Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:41:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kib@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:41:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223015 --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Keith White from comment #5) object->resident_page_fault is equally meaningless for your purposes. What= is not clear in my comment #4 ? The patch does not require any of these dynamic calculations using meaningl= ess (for this purpose) values. If you want to limit the tmpfs mount memory use, specify explicit limit to mount_tmpfs. The attempts to mis-use some pageda= emon or object internal counters would not work out, their purpose is very diffe= rent and they do not match with resource limiting for tmpfs. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=