From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 23:26:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE9616A404; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 23:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ruomad@free.fr) Received: from postfix2-g20.free.fr (postfix2-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520C113C45E; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 23:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ruomad@free.fr) Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by postfix2-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C500DD314F; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:06:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (vln78-1-82-238-160-33.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.160.33]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAC495F7A; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:06:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4616D272.30902@free.fr> Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:06:26 +0200 From: Bruno Damour User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:26:37 -0000 Thanks, fantasticly interesting ! > Currently ZFS is only compiled as kernel module and is only available > for i386 architecture. Amd64 should be available very soon, the other > archs will come later, as we implement needed atomic operations. > I'm waiting eagerly to amd64 version.... > Missing functionality. > > - There is no support for ACLs and extended attributes. > Is this planned ? Does that means I cannot use it as a basis for a full-featured samba share ? Thanks for your great work !! Bruno DAMOUR