From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 27 10:17:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2778A16A4B3 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 10:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ray.idi.ntnu.no (ray.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.107.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CBE4400D for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 10:17:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from morten@hauk10.idi.ntnu.no) Received: from hauk10.idi.ntnu.no (hauk10.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.102.222]) by ray.idi.ntnu.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8RHHSNs006627; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:17:29 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from morten@localhost) by hauk10.idi.ntnu.no (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h8RHHSk5068501; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:17:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from morten) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:17:28 +0200 From: Morten Rodal To: Roderick van Domburg Message-ID: <20030927171727.GA68494@hauk10.idi.ntnu.no> References: <000701c38517$18c08cc0$6ba55982@gog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000701c38517$18c08cc0$6ba55982@gog> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6 required=4 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-IDI cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 17:17:34 -0000 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very > experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e. > non-mission-critical) use? > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under bursts of load (i.e. a compile) -- Morten Rodal